The Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama was told how N640 million was withdrawn from the Kogi State Government account within six days.
A compliance officer with the United Bank for Africa, Abimbola Williams, Wednesday gave the narration while testifying as the third prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello.
Williams said the withdrawals were made through 64 cheques of N10 million each by the former Chief Accountant of the Government House, Abdulsalami Hudu, between July 31 and August 6, 2019.
Bello, Hudu, and the Director-General of the Kogi Government House Administration, Shaibu Oricha, are facing trial before Justice Maryanne Anenih over alleged N110.4bn fraud brought against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.
Under examination on Wednesday, the EFCC counsel, Pinheiro, had asked the witness, who told the court that she has been with her bank for 19 years, “Do you confirm there are serial transactions involving Abdulsalami Hudu?”
The witness responded in the affirmative, “Yes, my Lord.”
Pinheiro further asked, “Witness, do you see similar consistent transactions, like I said before, with Abdulsalami Hudu?”
The witness confirmed, saying, “Yes.”
The witness proceeded to explain to the court, stating that “between July 31 to August 6, 2019, the total amount of cash withdrawal made in six days by the 3rd defendant (Abdulsalami Hudu) was 64 transactions of 10 million naira each, which is a total withdrawal of 640 million naira.”
During cross-examination by the Defence Counsel, Joseph Daudu, the witness confirmed that she was not meeting the defence counsel for the first time and that she had given similar evidence before the Federal High Court in a suit markha, HC/ABJ/CR/98/2024, between the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Yahaya Adoiza Bello.
While she admitted that she is the Compliance Officer, she however added that she is not the Relationship Manager or the Account Officer responsible for the day-to-day management of the account.
She told the court that she understood the duties of a cashier, which include paying and receiving cash. She also admitted that a customer could withdraw money as much as he wished, provided the mandate was correct.
She told the court that, as a Compliance Officer, she could work in any branch she wished, adding that she reported for duty that morning at the Wuse 2 branch of her office in Abuja.
She said, “As a Compliance Officer, my Lord, I am actually allowed to work in any of the branches, so I can change anytime. Today, I reported to 18, Adetokunbo Ademola, Wuse 2, Abuja, this morning.”
Still responding to other questions from the Defence Counsel, Williams stated that while she was not in a position to know why the withdrawals were made, she added that during transfers, the bank requests the purpose of the transaction and the relationship for high-volume transactions.
She added that the bank does not make such enquiries in the case of cash withdrawals, noting that the banker is not an internal auditor of the customer.
She told the court that one Bello Abdullateef made transfers in tranches from the Government House account on July 5, 2019, but noted, under cross-examination, that her bank did not breach any regulations in allowing the withdrawals or transfers.
She added that there was no withdrawal that went beyond N10 million in all the transactions presented before the court.
The witness listed the authorised signatories on the Kogi Government House account, as at 2004, to include Christopher Enefola, Permanent Secretary; Onekutu Daniel, Chief Accountant; and Hudu Abdulsalami, Accountant (Exhibits F2, Page 37).
She mentioned a letter dated September 2008, with three signatures — Elder P.S. Ocheni, Abbas Ibrahim Abubakar, Chief Accountant; and Abdulsalami Hudu, Senior Accountant.
During cross-examination by Counsel to the 3rd defendant, A.M. Aliyu, the witness, was presented with a bank statement (Page 3 of F1, May 27, 2019), where the withdrawals were made.
She admitted that the narration on the credit entry was the Governor’s Security Fund and noted a credit entry of N100 million in two tranches of N50 million each.
Can you, on oath, tell this court that those funds were not used for security purposes after withdrawal?” the counsel asked.
“My Lord, I am not privy to the details of the transaction and cannot categorically answer that question,” the witness responded.
At the close of the cross-examination of the 3rd prosecution witness, the EFCC called its 4th subpoenaed witness, Jesutoni Akoni, a Compliance Officer with Ecobank, who confirmed that he had a 13-page document before him.
Counsel to the 2nd defendant, A.M. Aliyu, however, objected to the admissibility of the document tendered, saying it did not comply with the provisions of the Evidence Act.
The witness gave a detailed description of the statement of accounts, citing a cash deposit of N3 million by Moses Wanzu.
She cited another cash deposit by Abdulwahab Sabo of N15 million, and another by Shehu Bello of N20 million. She said the total amount of the four transactions was about N57 million.
She told the court she knew the branch in which the account was domiciled through the first three digits of the account number.
Under cross-examination by Daudu, the witness admitted not knowing the 1st defendant (Bello) and 3rd defendant (Oricha). She also admitted not knowing any of the things she mentioned in her testimony.
Under cross-examination by Aliyu, the witness admitted not knowing the source or purpose of the funds.
The prosecution then called its 5th witness from Polaris Bank, Victoria Oluwafemi.
Earlier, Daudu informed the court about an application before it, challenging jurisdiction.
He prayed the court to take their application so as not to waste precious time on witnesses.
“I urge your lordship to give us a date. Let’s deal with the issue of jurisdiction,” he submitted.
Prosecution’s counsel, Pinheiro, however, argued that the application was not ripe for hearing and that the motion should wait until November 12, another date for hearing.
“In respect of taking dates for the application, we have dates in November. Today and tomorrow are for hearing. Neither of the applications is ripe. Neither of the applications is ripe for hearing. We have been here for over one year and now you are raising the issue of jurisdiction,” Pinheiro said.
Daudu responded, stating, “We can raise it anytime.”
Pinheiro insisted, stating, “For the priority of time, November will be convenient for the hearing of the two applications.”
The trial is scheduled to continue tomorrow, as Justice Anenih adjourned the matter to October 9, 2025, for continuation of the trial.
Ends
We launched the carbon markets policy. This means that we will be working with the likes of FIRS to be able to ensure that carbon credit as a revenue for solar developers is not taxed so that they are able to essentially use the money to either reduce the cost of solar, scale their operations or connect more people to solar and they have to show essentially working on how they do that and that’s why EcoWise has that end-to-end platform to ensure that that essentially happens in such a way that you know the money is not not being accounted for besides it’s not free money so essentially what EcoWise does is that end-to-end to ensure that that money in itself is translated into real value and I think that’s what the government is looking to see, looking to develop and looking to implement in not just the voluntary carbon markets but also compliant carbon markets. Thank you very much.
My name is Chibura Eze Eke, I am the CEO of SeeSolar. Partnering with Vector has been a tremendously rewarding experience for us. We’re in a space where there’s a there’s need for a lot of innovation and for you to innovate you need to go on a path that people have hardly gone and for us that innovation comes down to ensuring that as we are powering productivity for our customers especially in rural communities where we provide solar powered solutions we are not just doing that but we’re also going beyond to ensure that as we displace diesel and petrol powered solutions we are able to prove that we can earn carbon credits and I’m sure carbon credits some of you already understand what it is but I can explain in layman terms the idea here is to be able to ensure that if we are able to deploy solar solutions in this part of the world there are other parts of the world where people might not be able to deploy solar solutions but they’re happy to invest in the deployment of solar solutions so what that basically entails is that in terms of carbon credits as we deploy solutions here we’re able to earn credits from those who are able to pay for solutions like ours or supporting the payment of solutions like ours that displace carbon from the environment and this carbon obviously goes up to affect the ozone layer which is what affects us in terms of carbon emissions causing more rain so for us through innovation we’re able to impact the environment we’re able to earn more and partnering with a company like Vector simply helps us to ensure that we can also beyond earning some revenue from supplying electricity rural communities we can also earn additional revenue because we can sell carbon credits from those solar systems that we deploy in rural communities and then that ensures that is a win-win-win for the customers in those communities for us as a company and for Vector as a company.
So how does that impact on your productivity as far as your products? So for us it basically makes the economics better because it ensures that we earn more revenue and if we can and can earn more revenue we can get more products and get more products we can impact more people in more communities so it definitely goes down to support our top line. Does it affect the cost? For the cost of our systems this helps to to some extent cushion the effect of costs because if you’re able to earn more then you can even spend more in terms of the kind of impact you want to have in rural communities and what that means is you can support them with productivist equipment for them to be more productive and earn more in rural communities. Before you go is this a way of complimenting government effort in achieving this transition? Oh very much so we know that Nigeria has signed up to by the year 2060 to be able to be a you know a net neutral society meaning as we emit carbon we also displace the carbons we emit and there’s no better way to achieve net neutrality by one tracking the amount of carbon that we emit and then also earning some carbon credits because we make investments in solutions that displace carbon into the environment so this is one sure way to prove the concept that indeed energy transition is here to stay carbon emission is something that we can fight together against and companies like Sysola and Vector and other companies are putting their heads together to innovate to ensure that we achieve our goal of becoming a carbon-free society.
