Dr. Kayode Ajulo, An Abuja based Lawyer at the weekend disagreed with the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, on the directive to prosecute violators of the recent ban on Twitter operations in the country.
Twitter had deleted a tweet by President Muhammadu Buhari, which it found to be very offence and against its policy, an action which did not go down well with the Nigerian government who in turn slammed a ban on the operations of the social media network in the country.
Ajulo, in a statement, said reminded Malami that in a democratic setting, a country is run by the rules of law as provided by the constitution.
He therefore pointed out that the directive would be contrary to the provisions of Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution.
He also added that no where in the country’s various penal laws is a citizen of the country prohibited from receiving or disseminating information which as a right guaranteed under Section 39 of the Constitution.
He stated, “Sequel to the temporary ban of Twitter operations in Nigeria by the Federal Government on Friday, 4th June, 2021, my attention has been drawn to a directive credited to the Attorney General of the Federation for the prosecution of violators of the ban of the blogging company in Nigeria.
“Without prejudice to the rationale for the ban of the blogging site, it must be noted that the Nigerian democracy is a constitutional democracy based on the rule of law.
“Where the rule of law reigns, political expediency ought to be sacrificed on the altar of the rule of law so as to guarantee the continued existence of democratic institutions fashioned to promote social values of liberty, orderly conduct and development.
“The constitution of a nation is the fons et origo, not only of the jurisprudence but also of the legal system of the nation.
“It is the beginning and the end of the legal system. In Greek language, it is the alpha and the omega and the barometer with which government actions are measured.
“Without prejudice to the rationale for the ban of the blogging site in Nigeria, it is imperative to note that the provisions of Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution are clear to the effect; no one shall be prosecuted for an offence not known to Law,” he said.
Ajulo further stated: “For the sake of emphasis and for avoidance of doubt, Section 36 (12) provides as follows:
“Subject as otherwise provided by this Constitution, a person shall not be convicted of a criminal offence unless that offence is defined and the penalty therefore is prescribed in a written law.
“And in this subsection, a written law refers to an Act of the National Assembly or a Law of a State, any subsidiary legislation or instrument under the provisions of a law.
” I have carefully spectated the contents of our various penal laws and nowhere is a citizen of the country prohibited from receiving or disseminating information which as a right guaranteed under Section 39 of the Constitution.
“While I am weary to believe that the statement credited to the Honourable Attorney General of Federation, Mr. Abubakar Malami, SAN, is with respect, inchoate as the position of law is clear and unambiguous and whatever directive issued for the prosecution of violators of the ban of twitter blog in Nigeria runs contrary to the letters and the spirit of the constitution and same anachronistic in a democratic society where rule of law ought to be the guiding compass.”
